This post contains affiliate links. If you buy through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate disclosure.
If you've spent any time researching anti-aging after 40, you've probably noticed something:
Botox, fillers, lasers, microneedling or facelift? At 48, here's what I've tried, what I've stopped doing, and how I actually think about anti-aging now.
By Liz · · 17 min read
This post contains affiliate links. If you buy through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate disclosure.
If you've spent any time researching anti-aging after 40, you've probably noticed something:
Everything seems to promise everything.
One treatment "tightens." Another "lifts." Another "builds collagen." Another supposedly erases wrinkles, restores volume and somehow gives you your 30-year-old face back before lunch.
It gets confusing—and expensive—very quickly.
I'm 48, and I've been interested in this world for a long time. I've tried Botox. I've tried facial filler once. I've used plenty of at-home skincare and devices. I've spent more hours than I'd like to admit researching procedures, listening to surgeons and dermatologists, and trying to separate meaningful results from expensive maintenance.
And I think the biggest lesson I've learned is this:
Before asking what treatment is best, figure out what problem you're actually trying to solve.
Because Botox, filler, laser resurfacing and a facelift are not interchangeable. They address very different parts of facial aging.
This article reflects my personal experience and the research I've done for myself. Cosmetic procedures and prescription skincare have real risks and benefits, and what makes sense for one person may not make sense for another.
I find it helpful to divide visible facial aging into four basic categories.
Dynamic wrinkles — lines caused or worsened by repeated facial movement, like crow's feet, forehead lines and the "11s" between the eyebrows.
Skin quality — sun damage, pigmentation, rough texture, uneven tone, certain fine lines. This is primarily about the surface of the skin.
Volume loss — faces naturally change with age. We can lose and redistribute fat, bone structure shifts, and areas that once looked fuller can begin to look flatter or more hollow.
Sagging and laxity — jowls, loose neck skin, tissue descent, hanging or excess skin.
This distinction matters enormously. If your main concern is pigmentation, treating your facial muscles isn't going to erase a sunspot. If your problem is major jowling, resurfacing the top layer of your skin isn't going to mechanically reposition descended facial tissue.
The right treatment depends on the problem.
Botox is probably the first cosmetic procedure most women think about when they hear "anti-aging."
It's a botulinum toxin medication injected into specific muscles to temporarily reduce muscle activity. For expression-related wrinkles — forehead lines, frown lines, crow's feet — it works. The FDA-approved cosmetic uses are well established, and the effect on things like the glabellar area typically lasts roughly three to four months.
What it doesn't do: replace lost facial volume, remove sunspots, or meaningfully tighten significant loose skin. It treats muscle-driven wrinkles. That's it.
I started getting Botox in my late twenties and early thirties, mostly around my eyes and between my eyebrows. I never did it continuously — I tended to go much longer between treatments than most people do.
And yes, it reduced movement exactly as it was supposed to.
But here's my honest experience: I didn't like it.
I didn't like feeling that my expressions were restricted. I didn't love the injections or the occasional bruising. I didn't want the ongoing maintenance. I didn't want to keep injecting something into my face every few months indefinitely. And at some point I looked at the cost, the commitment and the trade-offs and decided:
This isn't worth it to me.
I haven't had Botox since I was 38. That's a personal choice — not a claim that Botox doesn't work. It does work for what it's designed to do. I just personally don't want it.
Another woman may look at those exact same trade-offs and decide the opposite. That's completely valid.
Dermal filler is designed to add or restore volume. Hyaluronic-acid fillers can be used in areas like the cheeks, lips and chin depending on the specific product and indication.
I had cheek filler once when I was around 34. I was hoping for a subtle lifting effect because I was already beginning to notice changes in my lower face.
I didn't like how it looked on me.
That single experience doesn't mean filler always looks bad — I've seen filler that is extremely subtle and beautifully done. But it changed how I thought about using filler as a long-term strategy for myself.
For years, many patients were told that hyaluronic-acid filler would simply disappear after a relatively short period. The reality appears to be more complicated. Imaging research has found detectable hyaluronic-acid filler in some patients substantially longer than people historically expected — though different fillers and facial areas behave differently.
That doesn't mean everyone has filler sitting unchanged in their face for a decade. But I would no longer assume that every injectable simply vanishes on a predictable timetable.
Migration is also a recognized potential complication, though it certainly doesn't happen to everyone. And rare but serious complications — including accidental injection into a blood vessel — are one reason injector skill and anatomy knowledge matter enormously.
For me, the combination of maintenance, cost, unpredictability, the possibility of accumulating product over time, and the fact that filler doesn't really solve significant skin laxity — it all adds up to something I personally don't want to keep doing.
I'm not comfortable with the idea of repeatedly adding material to my face over years. That's my conclusion for myself.
Used well, filler can restore or reshape volume. I'm not saying it has no appropriate use. I'm saying it's not the answer I want for my face.
Unlike Botox or filler, resurfacing treatments can directly target skin quality — and that's where my interest has shifted.
Depending on the technology, lasers can help with sun damage, uneven pigmentation, texture, certain scars, fine lines and photoaging. Some resurfacing technologies also stimulate collagen remodeling.
That doesn't mean a laser is a nonsurgical facelift. If someone has significant jowling or hanging neck skin, improving the surface of the skin is not the same thing as repositioning the deeper tissues. I think that distinction is really important.
But if the problem is sun-damaged, uneven or rough-looking skin — that's a completely different category, and this is where laser resurfacing makes much more sense to me than trying to use it to create a major structural lift.
I haven't personally had laser resurfacing yet. But I'm genuinely interested in it specifically for pigmentation, sun damage and overall skin quality on my face and chest. When I eventually choose one, I'll share exactly what I chose and why.
Microneedling works by creating controlled microscopic injuries in the skin, triggering a wound-healing response and collagen production. There's evidence for improvements in acne scars, texture, fine lines and uneven tone.
My issue with many treatments — and this applies to microneedling too — isn't necessarily that they do absolutely nothing. My issue is:
For me, the bar is whether the improvement is substantial enough to be worth it. I want to see a real difference — not a subtle change that requires a series of treatments and a lot of maintenance to maintain.
That's a personal threshold. Someone else might find the improvement from microneedling completely worth it. I'm just honest that my standard for "worth it" is fairly high.
Peels can have a place depending on their depth and the concern being treated. Again, think surface: pigmentation, texture, fine lines, sun damage.
Different depths of peel come with very different levels of risk, recovery and potential improvement. What I would no longer do is choose a procedure because the marketing says it "rejuvenates the face." I want to know exactly what layer or structure a treatment is changing — and how much change I should realistically expect.
That question eliminates a lot of confusion and a lot of wasted money.
This is one of the strongest personal conclusions I've come to, and I want to be clear about it.
If what bothers you is significant jowling, loose lower-face skin, hanging neck skin or deeper tissue descent — there is a limit to what topical skincare, Botox, filler, lasers or at-home devices can mechanically accomplish. A facelift or neck lift is surgery specifically designed to address sagging tissues of the face and neck.
That does NOT mean everyone needs or should want surgery. Surgery is expensive. It has real risks. It requires significant research and the right surgeon. And many women genuinely don't want it — and that's completely valid.
But years ago, I realized something that changed how I think about all of this:
I didn't want to spend indefinitely on temporary treatments trying to achieve a result they weren't designed to produce.
For the kind of lower-face and neck changes that bother me, I decided I'd rather carefully research surgery and save toward that possibility than continually spend money chasing a dramatic structural lift through treatments that aren't designed to create one.
That's my conclusion for myself. I'm not telling every woman to get a facelift. I'm saying that for the specific result I personally want, I'd rather wait for the treatment designed to produce it.
Dermatologists generally recommend broad-spectrum SPF 30+ to help reduce additional UV-related skin aging. That is the conventional recommendation, and it's well-supported by evidence.
I also want to be honest: sunscreen hasn't been the central focus of the personal routine I'm describing here. I'm sharing what I actually do and what I've chosen for myself — not pretending I follow every standard anti-aging recommendation perfectly.
I use a retinoid in my own routine. Prescription tretinoin and other retinoids have considerably more evidence behind them for improving fine lines, uneven pigmentation and aspects of skin texture than most trendy "anti-aging" ingredients.
They aren't instant. Consistency matters. And more irritation isn't necessarily better — finding a strength and schedule your skin can tolerate is much more useful than buying the strongest formula possible and then being unable to use it.
I research ingredients extensively. I care much more about what's actually in a product — the actives, the concentrations, how a formula performs — than the brand name or the price tag.
I use skincare including a retinoid and other actives. I've experimented with vitamin C, growth factors and hormonal or estrogen-related skincare. Not all of those categories have the same level of evidence behind them, and I try to be honest about that distinction.
But the focus for me is always: "This is how I evaluate products for myself." Not "here is the medically approved routine."
If you've followed me for any length of time, you already know I use castor oil. I've used it consistently for years.
I love how it feels. I love how moisturized my skin feels when I use it. I love using it as the final, heavier layer in my nighttime routine. My skin looks and feels better when I use it consistently.
I'm not claiming castor oil rebuilds collagen, tightens sagging skin or functions like a retinoid. It doesn't. But it's something I genuinely love and have used for years, and I'm not going to downplay that just because it's not a prescription product.
Red-light photobiomodulation is something I genuinely like and use regularly. I travel with a red-light device. I consider it one of the at-home tools I actually value.
Research on photobiomodulation is promising — there are randomized clinical studies showing improvements in facial wrinkles with certain red-light protocols. Results depend on wavelength, dose, irradiance, device quality and consistency, so not every inexpensive red bulb produces the same result as a studied device.
But for me personally, this is something I've found worthwhile and I enjoy using it.
I also want to be clear: red-light therapy and morning outdoor light are two completely different things. I personally value morning outdoor light as part of my health and lifestyle routine — it's something I enjoy and I think it's good for me. But that's separate from red-light photobiomodulation. They're not the same intervention.
Time-restricted eating was one of the biggest health changes I've ever made, and I want to be honest about what it actually did for me.
It helped me stop eating all day. It gave me structure around when I ate. I cut back significantly on heavily processed foods. I lost substantial weight over time. And I felt dramatically better as my overall eating habits changed — more energy, better sleep, just better overall.
I associate those changes with real improvements in how I felt and looked.
Research doesn't show intermittent fasting is universally superior to other calorie-controlled approaches — that's worth knowing. But for me, it was the eating structure I could actually maintain, and it changed my health and weight in a way that nothing else had.
I also try to eat more real food and fewer highly processed packaged foods. I prefer homemade or locally made versions when it's practical. I don't eat perfectly. But I've made real changes and they've made a real difference.
I want to be honest here too: exercise has not historically been the main driver of my weight loss. I stay somewhat active through normal life — walking, dancing — but I haven't historically followed a consistent structured exercise routine.
That's changing as I approach 50. I'm becoming much more interested in exercise because of its broader health benefits — cardiovascular health, bone density, muscle, brain health — and because of emerging research suggesting it may also positively affect skin structure and elasticity.
One small study of middle-aged women found improvements in skin elasticity and dermal structure after both aerobic and resistance training. That's interesting and promising, even if I'd still call it early research rather than settled science.
For me, exercise is becoming a bigger priority. But I'm not going to pretend I've been consistently working out for years when I haven't.
After everything I've tried and researched, my own approach has become surprisingly clear.
For skin quality and surface concerns: I'm interested in professional laser treatment when the timing and device make sense for me.
For my daily skincare: Consistent use of a retinoid and other actives I've researched and chosen for myself.
For moisture: A good moisturizer and castor oil as my final heavier layer — because I love it.
For an at-home treatment I actually enjoy: Red-light therapy when I can use it consistently.
For overall health: Real food, time-restricted eating, better sleep, weight management and increasingly, exercise.
For significant structural sagging: I don't expect skincare or devices to do the job of surgery. If and when that bothers me enough, I'd rather consider surgery than endlessly chase a surgical-level result with nonsurgical treatments.
That last distinction has probably saved me more money and frustration than anything else.
I also want to say something that gets lost in conversations about anti-aging:
You don't have to do anything.
Aging naturally is completely valid. Most of the women in my real life aren't chasing every cosmetic procedure. I know women in their fifties, sixties, seventies and eighties whose joy, energy, kindness and confidence make them genuinely beautiful.
I'm personally interested in aging well aesthetically because I enjoy it. I like skincare. I like researching. I like looking polished. I want the outside to reflect how energetic and alive I feel inside.
But I don't want anti-aging to become another way women are told they're never good enough.
I'm actually excited to turn 50. My goal isn't to look 25.
I want to look as good and healthy as I can at the age I actually am.
And after everything I've tried and researched, I think understanding what each treatment can — and cannot — do is one of the smartest places to start.
Here's everything I mention in the video. I've divided this into what I'm currently using and what I've tried in the past.
Some links in this section are affiliate links — I may earn a commission if you purchase through them, at no extra cost to you. I only share products I've personally used.
SkinMedica TNS Advanced+ Serum — a growth-factor serum I use regularly. It's an investment but one I keep coming back to.
Compounded tretinoin formula — I use a custom compounded formula: tretinoin 0.14% + azelaic acid 5% + tranexamic acid 5% + niacinamide 4%, through Agency Skin. (Referral/affiliate relationship — link may earn a commission.)
M4 Face Cream Rx with Estriol — available here via LTK.
My favorite moisturizers — I rotate between these depending on how my skin is feeling:
Castor oil — I use these regularly as my final nighttime layer:
Morning skincare (occasional):
These are devices and products I've personally used and think have merit — but I want to be honest that I'm not currently using all of them regularly. I tried them, I have opinions on them, and I mention them in the video. Whether they're worth it for you depends on your goals and how consistently you'd actually use them.
Note on these links: Some of these may be affiliate or referral links — I'm flagging them individually below where I know the relationship. For any I'm unsure about, I've preserved the exact URL Liz provided and noted it for clarity.
In the video that inspired this article, I go deeper into my own Botox and filler experiences, what I've stopped doing, what I still use at home and how my thinking about anti-aging has changed as I approach 50.
I'd also love to know: What have you tried — and what was actually worth it for you?
Free Resource
My free skincare routine guide covers the basics I rely on every day — the products, the order, and why consistency matters more than any single treatment.
Get the Free Skincare GuideQuick Reference
Results vary by treatment, device, technique, patient and severity. No single treatment is universally "best" — the question is whether you're using the right tool for the problem you actually have.
Botox
Best for: Expression-related wrinkles
Doesn't primarily fix: Pigmentation, lost volume, significant sagging
Dermal Filler
Best for: Restoring or reshaping volume
Doesn't primarily fix: Sun damage, skin texture, loose hanging skin
Laser / Resurfacing
Best for: Pigmentation, sun damage, texture, certain fine lines
Doesn't primarily fix: Major jowls or significant tissue laxity
Microneedling
Best for: Texture, scars, fine lines, collagen remodeling
Doesn't primarily fix: Significant structural sagging
Facelift / Neck Lift
Best for: Jowls, loose tissue, significant face/neck laxity
Doesn't primarily fix: Pigmentation, pores, surface sun damage
| Treatment | Best suited for | Doesn't primarily fix |
|---|---|---|
| Botox | Expression-related wrinkles | Pigmentation, lost volume, significant sagging |
| Dermal Filler | Restoring or reshaping volume | Sun damage, skin texture, loose hanging skin |
| Laser / Resurfacing | Pigmentation, sun damage, texture, certain fine lines | Major jowls or significant tissue laxity |
| Microneedling | Texture, scars, fine lines, collagen remodeling | Significant structural sagging |
| Facelift / Neck Lift | Jowls, loose tissue, significant face/neck laxity | Pigmentation, pores, surface sun damage |
Sources & Further Reading
Want to hear my full story — including what I've stopped doing and why?
Watch the Full Video on YouTubeMore from Stylish & Grateful
This post contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through one of my links, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. I only share products I genuinely use, like or think may be helpful.
This post may contain affiliate links. I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Topics
Written by
LizLiz is the creator of Stylish & Grateful — helping women over 40 look better, feel better, and live better.
More from Stylish & Grateful
This post contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through one of my links, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. I only share products I genuinely use, like or think may be helpful.

There's a difference between looking younger and trying too hard. Here are 10 things that age you after 40 — and what I do instead.
My simple everyday makeup routine at 48, including the lightweight BB cream, brow pencil, mascara and mature-skin makeup tricks I actually use.

What happened when I started using castor oil nightly: my personal results for skin, lashes, brows and hair, plus how I use it.